Previous

Contents

Next


14.   Help of Christians and Non-Christians

THE HISTORIAN who does not believe in a supernatural influence on natural events must nevertheless know and admit that the Church does, and has traditionally had recourse to Mary to get results, and got them at Lepanto, Vienna, Belgrade, and elsewhere.  Should he fail to make the observation in his survey of the facts, he betrays a blind spot that prevents a genuine report at all.  To be consistent, he would have to disallow the divine interventions all through the Old Testament when the enormously weaker side in a battle wins the victory.  Explain it how he will, the record is there.

      "Though the army of the Syrians had come with few men, the Lord delivered into their hand a very great army"—the much larger army of the Israelites.  Why?  The text without the question has the answer, "because they had forsaken the Lord, the God of their fathers" (2 Chron. 24:24).  There, an avenging Providence has taken sides in an uneven battle to defeat the stronger forces of an unfaithful people.  Conversely, during their seasons of repentance, the record of the same people tells of quick turnovers from imminent disaster to their finest triumphs.

      King David, having against heavy odds won the victory that brought him the crown and preserved the nation, takes no credit to himself.  He knows better.  He thanks God for it.  And since it was a national no less than a personal rescue from ruin, the psalmist pluralizes his pledge of gratitude to include his countrymen.  "We," he promises the almighty Victor, "will sing and praise thy power" (Ps. 21:13).

      Victories of the kind come from God at a time the beneficiaries are true to him.  So it was before Christ.  So it remains.  Yet ever since the Son of God entered human history as a Child from a virgin mother, it has pleased the Blessed Trinity to work the interventions through her.  This has been the rich experience of the Church.       

      St. John Bosco, who gloried in Mary's role as help of Christians, did not understand it narrowly.  He saw in it no conflict with another role of hers, but rather an expression of her maternal solicitude for the whole human race.  He saw that, while she used her God-given power in battle after battle to rescue the Church from imminent ruin, she was equally benefiting the non-Catholic Christian in a world of practical atheism that would abolish Christianity altogether if it could.  Nor, of course, did he fail to see that unbelievers who turned to Christ would not have turned to him without an awareness of him.  And who best keeps that awareness of its Savior alive in the world, if not the teaching Church?  Accordingly, her survival must be accounted a blessing to all such converts.

      St. John Bosco liked to believe, moreover, that these converts number high: as high as Mary, their unfailing auxiliatrix, could in conformity to justice raise the total.  Her influence works more often in secrecy than not, so that for every known Saul who becomes a Paul, there must be multitudes of him unknown.  Statistics of newcomers to the Church belittle the truth.  They simply do not know the score.  Be prepared for plenty of surprises in heaven.

      The fact is, the most embarrassing threats to the Church have come from within.  Arius was a priest, Nestorius an archbishop, Eutyches an abbot.  But aside from attacks on her doctrinal life, history supplies a number of political assaults from her rebellious children.  There fell a period in the early nineteenth century, to take one of several choice examples, when her supreme pontiff was kidnapped, locked into a carriage and smuggled out of Rome, to be held a prisoner for five years, in Savona for three of them, in Fontainebleau through the remaining two.  At Grenoble, during a stopover on the way, it was said of the captive in the carriage: "He isn't Pope Pius the Seventh; he is Pope Pius the Last."  The sneer made the rounds among the hostile who were ever ready to chant their cheerful dirge over the Church who has always somehow survived her many intended funerals.  Minus the pope, they thought to themselves, how long can the Church stay alive?  They had not counted on Mary, Help of Christians, even against Christians.

      Napoleon, still a Catholic at heart, knew better than to expect the demise of the indestructible Church.  But at the same time his attempt to subject the Holy See to his political aims by abducting its apostolic occupant, incited the fond hopes of the would-be pallbearers.  The attempt failed.  Pope Pius would concede nothing.  He refused to lift the ban of excommunication from the recalcitrant emperor.  The refusal stunned Bonaparte who had in anticipation of the censure written from Dresden to his stepson: "So ridiculous an idea can emanate only from a profound ignorance of the day in which we live; the idea is a thousand years out of date."  Then followed his famous reference to the pontiff he had so completely misunderstood: "Would he place my throne under an interdict?  Would he excommunicate me?  Does he suppose that then the muskets will fall from the hands of my soldiers?"

      Whether or not Pope Pius VII thought they would, they did.  Less than three years after his excommunication, Napoleon on the retreat from Moscow did in truth see the muskets drop from the benumbed hands of his grenadiers—whole regiments of them.  Till then, his mastery over Europe had climbed steadily to a peak.  Victory after victory he had won.  There seemed to be no stopping his will to dominate.  Once when a chamberlain had ushered into his presence three European kings, the busy emperor backed them into the hall with the command: "Let them wait."  No monarch dared to contract him, save one, and he but a spiritual one who was safely imprisoned, put out of action, nullified.  And yet, His Imperial Majesty might well have wondered, what did it all now avail him as here in the Russian snow the frost more effectively than bullets went to work on his proud army?

      It was the turning of fate against him, the historians say.  He had had his period of glory.  It now lay behind him.  But Napoleon himself, steeped in the homiletic reasonings of Bossuet, would not have been inclined to attribute the reversal to fate.  He frowned on the pagan world.  If he did not practice his faith, at least he had never quite lost it.  Shakespeare rather had the idea he could respect, with a capital D in the synonym for Providence:

                              There's a Divinity that shapes our ends,

                              Rough-hew them how we will.

      Napoleon, when himself a captive languishing in exile, recovered in full the faith he had subdued but never relinquished to the demands of his ambition.  It had always been there.  He had the pope come to Paris to preside at his coronation in Notre Dame because he considered it the right thing to do.  Certainly on the occasion that the Abbé Emery protested to his imperial face the seizure of the papal states, which had preceded the seizure of the Holy Father, he replied altogether in character: "Well, I do not deny the spiritual power of the pope, since he received that from Jesus Christ; but it was Charlemagne, not Christ, who gave the temporal power to him, and I, as successor to Charlemagne, now deprive him of it."

      His kidnapping the pope provided to be the blunder that underlay the immediate causes of his downfall.  It provoked an indignation that left Europe buzzing like an aroused nest of hornets.  It stirred up, says Belloc, "the moral forces of Europe which had hitherto lain dormant."  It stiffened the opposition to the Grand Army of the Republic which in the long run must tell.  But meanwhile the emperor in saddle galloped from one conquest to another.  Nothing could yet match his military exploits; it began to look as if the Holy Father would die in prison; would the conqueror date to name his successor?  Then, like a sudden light in the dark, came hope.  Instinctively better than half the continent turned in appeal to its traditional stand-by in need, Our Lady, Help of Christians.  A campaign got under way, which gained momentum at each new report of a Napoleonic triumph.  A determination took hold of the weaponless faithful.  If his military stratagems could not be stopped, they'd pray for a change of heart in the man.  They'd do it with the rosary.

      The change of heart in Napoleon came.  Not for many months, and only after his grievous setback from the Russian winter, but come it did on January 22, 1814.  The great warrior still had plenty of fight left in him, what with the eventual battle of Waterloo a year and a half away.  But his arrogance was gone.  Not unaware of the rosary crusade in appeal to a higher court, which he respected, he knew now his outrage on the papacy had backfired.  It hurt him badly.  He set Pope Pius free.

 

      There was no hurrying the pope out of the chateau in Fontainebleau.  He was allowed a leisurely departure.  It proved to be a triumphant exodus the whole way to Rome.  Cheering spectators lined the roads over which the papal carriage rode through the countryside from town to town.  There were scheduled stopovers for luncheons and lodging at night and for religious services during the day, outdoors and in churches.  His Holiness would lead the crowds in prayers of gratitude to Our Lady, Help of Christians, and upon her statue wherever one stood ready to his hand he would place a floral wreath.  Many such a statue awaited the honor on temporary pedestals along the roadside, so that probably no horses in the history of their species ever witnessed more coronations and heard more recited rosaries than the thoroughbreds that in easy stages escorted Pope Pius VII out of France into Italy and Rome.

      The Vicar of Christ reached the outskirts of the Eternal City on May 24th, the date he accordingly selected for the new local feast to be inserted into the liturgy, that of Mary, Help of Christians.  The next day he was back at St. Peter's at last, and in full possession.  The papal states would soon be restored to him.  The long trial was over.  Her special advocate in trouble again relieved the Church.

      Meanwhile back in Fontainebleau, Napoleon Bonaparte signed his abdication.  His reign was over.  The absolute power he had exerted was taken from him; he would reclaim it for a while; then yield it for the rest of life to an austere exile on the Isle of St. Helena.  The perpetrator of a sacrilege upon the Holy See, now himself a captive under the custody of the English, had ample time to reflect on the ironic shift of events.  In disgrace, deserted by his former colleagues in power, he would not have had no one of influence to befriend him if he had not turned his own prisoner free.  Pope Pius stood out as his benefactor.  To begin with, he instructed his secretary to write a letter to each of the allied monarchs, and in particular the prince-regent of England, to ask for a kind treatment of their exile.  It would be to him, he said, "an extraordinary joy to have helped lessen the torments of Napoleon."

      Then, His Holiness took pity on Napoleon's mother to Cardinal Consolvi, the papal secretary of state, tells it best and in words of a maternal warmth tells it all.  "The sole consolation left me," writes Letizia Buonaparte, "is the knowledge that the Holy Father forgets the past and remembers only his affection for those belonging to me.  We can find no refuge but under the pontifical government, and our gratitude is as great as the benefit.  I speak in the name of my entire family of proscribed ones; especially for him who is now slowly dying on a desert rock.  His Holiness and Your Eminence are the only persons in Europe who try to soften his fate."

      Pope Pius, having a true devotion to Mary, could have no animosity in his heart.  The two do not mix.  He had in prison prayed to her to get him free for the sake of the Church and to win back to the Church the wayward emperor.  There had not been then, there wasn't now, even a semblance of ill will toward Napoleon.  You will hear it said in his hometown, where they know him intimately, that Bishop James E. Walsh who languished for years in a Communist jail has nothing but kind words to say of his captors and the Chinese in general.  He loves them.  But what else should we expect of one who in solitary confinement retained his sanity by praying rosary after rosary all day long?  Whoever does that cannot hate people, no matter how odiously misled they are, because the practice inculcates an awareness that the very mother invoked is also theirs.  The rosary promotes a brotherly, a sisterly, benevolence.  That was what Pope Pius VII preached, and in his life exemplified.

      He prayed in and out of prison to Mary, Help of Christians, for the negligent Christian who had done him and the Church a grievous wrong.  The prayer was not wasted.  No prayer ever is.  Even if the prayed-for soul does not respond to the graces sent because of it, the prayer pleases the mediatrix of those graces and almighty God, their source, and that in itself makes the prayer worth while.  But in the case of Napoleon there was a magnificent response.  The turn of events could not disinterest him in his exploits; nor in the fame they brought him; but it did disillusion him of the unnecessary follies of his arrogance.  He repented these.  He went back, and with a fervor that edified his custodians, to the practice of his faith.  He became dead set on saving his soul. 

      In his stark confinement at St. Helena he prayed again the Hail Mary of his childhood, asking the Mother of God to remember him now and in the hour of his death.  He was resigned.  On the last New Year's morning of his life when his valet Marchland had expressed the hope that the allies would recall the sick man to a decent climate, Napoleon replied, "It shall be as God wills."  At a later time, his health failing rapidly, he cried out with a flash of his old dominance: "I must have a priest here.  I do not care to die like a dog."  A priest was sent for.  He came, a Pater Vignali, with the blessings of Pope Pius.  He stayed on as chaplain.  For the patient who had told his doctor that he would welcome death now asked his priest if the Blessed Sacrament might be brought into his presence and kept in his presence during his final agony.  The request was honored—well in advance.

      It was the least they could do for a dying man, and the very best thing possible.  It brightened the closing weeks of his exile—on earth.  He could look from his wretched iron bed through the open doorway of his small room into a dining-room now converted to a chapel.  A makeshift altar stood there, upon which regularly the Holy Sacrifice was offered.  But the bedroom door remained open after the Mass, so that for the rest of the day the quickly-made tabernacle with its Resident could be seen at will.  In that adorable Presence a dethroned emperor would die in peace.  On his last day of consciousness the priest was at his side, heard his confession, absolved him, administered to him the sacrament of the sick, but dared not give him Holy Viaticum.  His stomach cancer had gone too far to allow an intake of food.  But he had a crucifix by him.  It remained with him in death.  They had the courtesy to place it on his lifeless breast.

      Those historians who would have us believe that Napoleon Bonaparte died in degradation do not say enough.  They do not see far enough.  They miss the deeper truth.  And so they are essentially wrong.  He died rich.

      And that suggests another deficiency in the record, which cannot be helped.  If no chronicle tells to what a degree the prayers of Pope Pius aided the final return of the worldling to his boyhood piety, it is because the chronicler does not know.  But the mediatrix of that grace does.  Nor could she have forgotten an incident that occurred on the feast of her Assumption in 1769, the day Napoleone Buonaparte was born.  The mother of the infant, realizing whose feast it was and what feast it was on that August morning when the church bells of Corsica were ringing out their acknowledgment, took the newborn in her arms and dedicated him to the Queen of Angels.  A lifetime later this simple act of faith likewise had its degree of influence on the penitent who through the years had grown too famous to care about God—and now did.  Every prayer said for him by no matter whom, every sacrifice offered up for him, contributed to the nobility of his death.  Not one of all such efforts went unnoticed.  God's chosen agent put them all to good account.  They all made it so much the easier for the sinner to cooperate with that serene inner urging from the mother of divine grace. 

      The lesson to be learnt from the conversion of Napoleon, as from similar episodes in history, is the efficacy of intercessory prayer.  Let the prayer be addressed to whomever of the blessed, an angel or a saint, or to the angels and saints in general, or to their queen, or to the God of them all—let it be addressed directly to the Father, Son or Holy Spirit, or to the Trinity of the unified Persons—the prayer must in any case come to the attention of her who dispenses its merits.  A magnificent and harmonious communication system prevails in heaven.  It never breaks down.  Every prayer from earth, even when not addressed to her, is referred to Mary.  And having her for another, the suppliants may rest assured that she will make the most of their spiritual earnings.

      Look how, in early 1974, her influence softened the asperity between Christians and non-Christians of South Vietnam as soon as Buddhists and Caodaists and Hoa Haos engaged with Catholics in a crusade of prayer to her.  The facts intrigue.  Much to the satisfaction of the war-plagued nation it had been announced that, to climax the crusade, the pilgrim statue of Our Lady of Fatima would be flown in from across the Pacific.  And indeed it was.  The statue with its escort of forty members of the Blue Army arrived from the United States on January 31, 1974.

      The statue remained three days with the Vietnamese.  They responded multitudinously.  Upwards of two millions of them, according to an official estimate, came to this station or that to view it during the triduum of prayer.  Borne on floats worthy of a queen, it traveled the country.  The Caodaists, eyewitness John Haffert reports, had a specially made pavilion waiting on their temple grounds to receive it.  The gates to those sacred precincts had never before been opened to members of an alien faith.  In the name of the Our Lady of Fatima they now were.  The turnout, with the Caodaists robed in ceremonial white, numbered into the tens of thousands.

      Prior to that, indeed the first rally around the statue had been held on a site where a Catholic shrine had once stood and now lies in ruins, perilously close to the North Vietnamese border.  The vast throng, as in very other rally, forgot their religious and political differences to pray together to the Mother of God.  They showed no fear of the snipers that infested the area.  Their confidence was not foolhardy.  Nobody got hurt.  Who knows but what the snipers themselves had come out to pray?

      Typical of the enthusiasm shown, a Cambodian woman had no sooner learned of the statue's being in Vietnam that she ordered a bouquet of orchids to bring to it.  She set out for Saigon, where she knew a final demonstration was scheduled for the 3rd of February, featuring the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.  This grand farewell drew hundreds of thousands to the open centre of the city, the public square.  The like of it "has never taken place in our four thousand years of history" declared Congremann Do-Sinh-Tu.  But in the incredibly large overflow crowd, among whom the papal nuncio prayed alongside the dignitaries of other faiths, the Cambodian with the orchids was not to be found.  She was still on her way.

      Flown from Saigon to Bangkok, Thailand, the statue was taken eventually to the cathedral.  Another overflow crowd attended the services there, which included a Mass coram episcopo.  At the rear of that dense crowd a determined woman found it impossible to push her way through it.  In frustration she turned to a man standing by, who bore the air of an official and in fact was.  She spoke to him in English, identifying herself as a Buddhist from Cambodia, saying she had gone to Saigon to see the statue only to be told of its departure for Bangkok, and that she then followed it herself by plane—but still could not get near it.  Would he help her?  And she handed him a bouquet of thirty-three orchids with the urgent request that he use his influence to have the flowers placed at the pilgrim statue of Fatima.  Thus her gift of love, through the courtesy of Franco Rimini, reached its blessed destination at last.

      Let the blooms look a bit tired; it didn't matter; there was nothing wilted about the reverence in that Buddhist heart which would so honor the Mother of God.  The orchids traveled with the statue from Bangkok to Akra, once the Mongolian capital, and into the cathedral there.  Archbishop Athaide himself placed them in the sanctuary, where they stayed until they died of service in the Real Presence.  The whole incident, stranger than fiction, corroborates a finding of history: namely, that whatever goes to the honor of Mary redounds to the ultimate honor of her Son.

 

      That is the way she wants it.  That is the way it is.  Pope St. Pius V in the rosary procession through the streets of Rome carried the Blessed Sacrament.  The exiled Napoleon, so widely prayed for to Mary, died with a strong desire to be with his Eucharistic Lord.  Historic appeals to her have always led to a renewed fervor in the faithful, or on the part of unbelievers to a curious respect, for the adorable Mystery of the altar.  She sees to that.  The crowds at Saigon, of different faiths, came out to honor Our Lady of Fatima, but stayed for the outdoor Mass.  By whose influence do you suppose they did that?  Nothing like it had ever happened in the country before.

      Jamming the public square and the convergent streets, they listened with not a trace of dissent to the plea from the homilist to subdue their hatreds into a symphony of love under the maternal influence of Mary.  The cameras showed, in photos snapped from every feasible angle, the rapt attention on that sea of faces: a uniformity of trust in Our Lady of Fatima, to bring about harmony on earth at last.  Nor does the present Communist domination of the country militate against so well founded a trust. 

      It is becoming better known, that the Moslems cherish the word Fatima.  It is also known why Mohammed had given his daughter the name, and upon her death he wrote that she "is the holiest of all women in Paradise after Mary."  But how did a village in Portugal come by the name?  From the Moslems who once occupied the country.  Anyhow, though a mere coincidence, it endears Mary to them the more to be identified as Our Lady of Fatima.  Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, while director of the Society for the Propagation of the Faith, reported to the press that the appearance of her pilgrim statue in India, Africa and Asia would always start a wave of conversions to Catholicism.  He thinks that by and large the Mohammedans, who believe in the Virgin Birth, will through the effect of Our Lady of Fatima upon them eventually believe also in the Divinity of Christ.

      The response of the South Vietnamese to Our Lady of Fatima, when her statue appeared in their midst, affords a miniature preview of what she will accomplish among the divided Christians and non-Christians of the world when in desperation they turn to her.  Pope Leo XIII wrote out a question, for his 1895 encyclical on the Virgin Mary, which he then answered.  He did not need to answer it.  The reply lies implicitly clear in the very question: "Will not she employ her goodness . . . to bring to full perfection the blessing of unity among the members of the Christian family, which is to be the fruit of her motherhood?"  Prior to the question, there stands another in the context which takes for granted her effective custody over non-Christians as well.  Mindful of her Son's earnest prayer to his heavenly Father for the religious union of the nations, "will she not for that reason," concludes the Vicar of Christ, "arrange it so that under a marvelous enlightenment they will all strive as with one mind for unity?"

      In our day Pope Paul has expressed no less confidently the same conviction.  "Certainly it will be necessary to have much patience, much understanding, no hurry; but the desire is great; and prayer will animate it."  He was speaking to a crowd in St. Peter's Square, gathered there to recite with him the noonday angelus but now hearing these preliminary remarks of his.  "What is more," he continued, "Our Lady most holy, whom we implore as the Mother of Unity and Mother of the Church, will favor it with her powerful intercession until it has been fully received."

      That says it all.

 


Previous

Contents

Next

 

Webmaster: director@marys-touch.com

Copyright © 2018, Mary’s Touch By Mail. All rights reserved.